More info

Battery Management System Architecture Review

Are you working on a battery management system and want to identify at an early stage whether the architecture, safety concept and logic are working together effectively, before risks become deeply entrenched in development, testing or approval? This BMS architecture review identifies weaknesses, assesses the maturity of your architecture and recommends specific actions.
approx. 3 weeks
18.450
Akkuintergration Q scaled 1 -

Here’s what you’ll get from our Battery Management System Architecture Review:

An independent assessment of your Battery Management System architecture, focusing on quality and safety. We identify vulnerabilities, assess risks and derive specific, targeted improvement measures for your system architecture.

  • Assessment of the BMS system architecture and its interfaces
  • Analysis of the safety concept and safety mechanisms
  • Consistency between safety goals and architecture
  • Gap assessment at the architectural level
  • Identification of technical risks and critical architectural decisions
  • Structured review report on architectural quality and safety maturity
  • Gap assessment against relevant safety, quality and standards requirements
  • Analysis of architectural risks and vulnerabilities
  • List of measures with prioritisation, quick wins and structural improvements
  • Review workshop to discuss the results together
1.
Kick-off

Clarify the project context, objectives and available artefacts

2.
Document review

Review the system architecture, safety concept, safety analyses and software/hardware architecture

3.
Technical Analysis

Assess architectural structure, safety mechanisms and ISO 26262 compliance

4.
Review workshop

Discuss and prioritise the results with your team

5.
Results Report

You will receive a review report, a gap assessment and specific actions

Please note: We tailor the scope, depth and level of detail to the current status of your project and the available artefacts.

  • BMS System Architecture Documentation
  • Safety Concept
  • Requirements
  • Safety analyses such as FMEA
  • Software and Hardware Architecture
  • Project context, objectives and available artefacts

Scope of services:

  • 3–6 expert days of analysis
  • 1 review workshop
  • 1 structured report on findings
  • Independent assessment of architectural quality, safety maturity and risks

Typical timeframe:

  • Typical duration: 1–3 weeks net
  • Suitable for preparing for safety assessments and OEM reviews
  • Useful prior to SOP or for validating new architectural concepts

Weitere Dienstleistungen aus dem B&W Universum